There’s a piece of advice floating around growth-marketing circles right now: don’t outsource your growth, build it. Hire the people. Own the function. Treat marketing as a core competency, not a rented department.
It’s good advice. For the wrong company.
Who this advice is actually for
Look closely at where this idea comes from, and it’s almost always aimed at organizations that already have the option to hire — companies with enough revenue, enough structure, and enough runway to bring on a marketing lead, wait three to six months for them to ramp up, then start building out a team under them. The pitch is: we’ll coach your leadership, you build the engine.
That’s a real model, and for a mid-size company with a budget line for it, it can work.
It just doesn’t describe most businesses.
What it looks like below 20 employees
If you’re a founder running a clinic, a trades business, or a small agency, you don’t have a marketing department waiting to be coached. You have yourself, maybe one or two people who already have full plates, and a growing sense that “we should really be doing more marketing” — squeezed in between everything else that actually keeps the business running.
Being told to “build an in-house growth engine” in that situation isn’t a roadmap. It’s advice for a company you don’t have yet, if you ever will. Recruiting takes months. Onboarding takes more. And the person you eventually hire needs someone experienced to manage them — which puts you right back to square one, just with payroll attached.
The honest version of “build vs. buy” for a business this size isn’t really a choice. It’s whether you get execution now, from someone who already knows what they’re doing, or you spend the next two quarters trying to build the thing everyone tells you to build.
What execution instead of coaching looks like
This is the actual difference between hiring a coach and hiring a system. A growth system doesn’t sit beside your business telling you what your future team should do. It is the function — running design, content, and paid acquisition as one coordinated unit, without you needing to recruit, manage, or wait for anyone to ramp up.
At Emporiant, that’s structured as four tiers, because “growth” means something different depending on where you are:
- Starter (€450/month) — design and content, for businesses that need consistent output without touching paid ads yet.
- Visibility (€900/month) — adds Meta paid ads on top of the same content foundation.
- Acquisition (€1,800/month) — full acquisition system, limited slots.
- Scale (€2,500/month) — the highest-touch tier, also capped, for businesses ready to grow fast without losing quality control.
Notice what’s not on that list: a coaching call telling you how to build your own version of this. The tiers exist because different businesses need different amounts of “already done for you,” not different amounts of advice.
The actual question to ask
Before you take “build your own in-house team” advice at face value, ask what it assumes about your business. Does it assume you already have headcount? A hiring budget? Six months of patience while a new hire finds their feet?
If the answer is no — and for most founder-led businesses, it is — the more honest move isn’t building a team from scratch. It’s plugging into one that already exists.
Curious what a growth system looks like when it executes instead of coaches? See how the tiers break down and where your business fits.


Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.